Here, There and Everywhere 1World2Travelers: Diet: Mini Fasting for Fat Loss

8min read

Just touching base on intermittent fasting as a dieting and lifestyle approach again...

In my years of experience both professionally and personally I have tried many things in the dietary department. Trial and error experimenting with my body and different methods that come to fame or resurface in the fitness industry.

I want to talk about some new evidence that's I have found through my research, again about intermittent fasting...

A new type of intermittent fasting allows you to lose body fat fairly painlessly while simultaneously improving fitness

Lifters are often wary of intermittent fasting schemes. At first glance, the diets sound so promising. You get to eat quasi-normally for a few hours or a few days and then you suddenly shift gears by restricting calories for a bit in an effort to lose body fat while retaining all your muscle. The eventual hope is that you'll somehow slip one by Mother Nature and emerge built and lean without having to actually follow an annoying diet.

With that great, Houdini-like accomplishment in your pocket, you'll then have the confidence to get a PhD, compose a rousing rap opera based on Game of Thrones, and build an animatronic woman with the libido of a repressed Catholic school girl who can also field dress an elk, all at the same time.

Unfortunately, both sets of tasks are hard to pull off. The problem with intermittent dieting is that the dieting phase is usually too severe.

Despite your best efforts, you often end up losing muscle. But researcher Victoria Pons and her colleagues conducted a study on a type of intermittent fasting diet that seems to change body comp with minimal muscle loss while actually increasing physical performance parameters.

WHAT THEY ACTUALLY DID...

Pons recruited 12 trained athletes between the ages of 18 and 50 and put them on a diet where, for three alternating days a week, they restricted their calories by a modest 33% or so.

That means that for three alternate days (every other day) out of every seven, they restricted their calories by a third. On the other four alternate days of the week, they ate "normally," albeit at maintenance calorie levels. Both phases – the normal diet and the calorie restricted diet – consisted of approximately the same proportions of carbs, proteins, and fat.

The test subjects took in about 2400 calories a day on normal-diet days, plus or minus about 150. On restricted-calorie days, they ingested about 1500 calories a day. That's a deficit of about 800-900 calories per day.

All of the participants performed a maximal exercise stress test before and after the calorie restriction period, along with having blood samples taken before the diet and 3-minutes post-exercise.

WHAT THEY ACTUALLY FOUND...

After 6 weeks, the dieters lost about 15.1% of their body fat, most of it from their trunk, arms, and legs. Plasma triglycerides and cholesterol dropped by 14.1% and 4.3%, respectively. Additionally, performance factors such as heart rate, lactate levels, and fatigue perception dropped.

Now, the "bad" part. Participants also lost some lean mass – roughly 2.9%. However, participants in the study didn't eat a whole lot of protein (1 gram per kilogram). Even the researchers themselves speculated that the loss in lean tissue could have been ameliorated or even offset totally if the participants had upped their protein intake to 2.3 grams per kilogram.

Of course, their numbers regarding loss of lean body mass might have been off anyhow. Diets that involve carb depletion deplete the body of water, and that often flusters DEXA measurements and leads to exaggerated reports of how much muscle was lost.

Another problem in the diet was one that anyone could have anticipated: When you restrict calories, you also restrict nutrients. Daily intake of niacin, iron, riboflavin, pyridoxine, and vitamins A and D were reduced to less than 90% of the RDA, and intake of magnesium, potassium, zinc, and folic acid were reduced to 48-67% of RDAs.

Taking a multi-vitamin or choosing more nutrient-dense foods could have, of course, remedied that problem.

HOW TO USE THIS INFORMATION?

The "mini-fasting" protocol studied by Pons and her colleagues seems like a relatively pain-free way to lose body fat while actually increasing exercise performance and health parameters.

Here's what you need to do if you want to try it:

On day 1, restrict your normal maintenance diet by approximately one third. You can easily do this, for instance, by replacing one meal with a "protein pulse" which equates to simply replacing a meal with a virtually pure-protein, low-cal drink.

(This won't work if you replace a small snack with the protein pulse, you cheater you. Instead, you have to replace a legitimate meal so that you achieve the 33% calorie reduction crucial to the mini-fasting diet.)

• On the next day, eat your normal, maintenance calorie diet.

• On the third day, restrict calories by a third again.

• Continue in this one day on, one day off manner until you reach your body comp goals.

As noted in the study, taking in less food means you'll also be taking in fewer nutrients, so supplement with a multi-vitamin or choose appropriately nutrient-dense foods.

Also, make sure you're taking in 2 to 2.3 grams of protein per kilogram of bodyweight as insurance against the loss of muscle. That would equate to between 180 and 207 grams of protein for a 200-pound man.

Source

Pons, Victoria, et al. "Calorie restriction regime enhances physical performance of trained athletes," Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 9 March, 2018